Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20243343459

Land at Moneypot Lane , Redgrave, IP22 1SF

Planning appeal 3343459 at Land at Moneypot Lane , Redgrave, IP22 1SF (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2024 by Inspector Morgan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether an overriding business need for the proposed development in this location has been demonstrated.

described on the application form as ‘seven new chalets with access track, parking and foul drainage. Expanding on the current site which currently houses three existing chalets.’

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Morgan R
Postcode
IP22 1SF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether an overriding business need for the proposed development in this location has been demonstrated
  • whether the proposed development would be accessible by a range of transport modes
  • whether safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved
  • the effect of the proposal on the internationally important Redgrave and Lopham Fen
  • the effect on protected species
  • whether the proposal would meet policy requirements for a measurable net gain in biodiversity

What decided it

The proposal fails to comply with the development plan on multiple grounds: lack of demonstrated overriding business need, poor accessibility by transport modes, inability to guarantee safe access, unresolved impacts on protected habitats and species, and failure to provide for biodiversity net gain.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP03Policy LP13Policy SP07Policy LP12Policy RED14Policy RED15Policy LP29Policy SP09Policy LP24Policy LP15Policy LP26Policy LP16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 88Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed18 June 20266006248
    Old Wood Hall, Great Green, Thrandeston, Diss, IP21 4BN
  2. Dismissed16 June 20266006837
    Barn Owl Campsite, Felsham Road, Rattlesden, IP30 0SG
  3. Dismissed5 March 20263376024
    Grange Farm Barn Potash Lane, Wyverstone, Stowmarket, IP14 4SL
  4. Allowed11 July 20253354473
    Camping Site And Premises Sudbourne Hall Farm, Mill Road, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SE
  5. Dismissed1 November 20243340878
    Dunston House, Sandy Lane, Hemingstone, Suffolk, IP6 9QD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.