Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20253340986

16-18 Thornfield Road, LONDON, W12 8JG

described in the application as: Flats B at first floor level, Flat C at ground and first floor level (rear right), Flat D at basement floor level (right) and Flat E at basement level (left)

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moss J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the breach of planning control comprises a breach of condition or a material change of use of the appeal property
  • If a breach of condition, whether this breach has been continuous for a period of 10 years or more beginning with the date of the breach
  • If a material change of use, whether the use of the appeal property as four flats has continued substantially uninterrupted for a period of four years or more beginning with the date of the breach

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficiently precise and unambiguous evidence on the balance of probability that the use as four self-contained flats has continued substantially uninterrupted for four years or more from the date of the breach.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.