Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 August 20243341108

Cartwright Gardens, Harlingford Hotel, London, WC1H 9EL

Planning appeal 3341108 at Cartwright Gardens, Harlingford Hotel, London, WC1H 9EL (London Borough of Camden) was allowed on 30 August 2024 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed works and development would preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed 61-63 Cartwright Gardens or any features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

Erection of external elevator shaft for improved accessibility, external alterations to existing openings to enable lift access to respective floors and guest bedrooms and associated internal alterations to enable the same

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Scott A
Postcode
WC1H 9EL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed works and development would preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed 61-63 Cartwright Gardens or any features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
  • Whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Bloomsbury Conservation Area

What decided it

The public benefits of improved accessibility for disabled guests and sustaining the hotel's viable use provided clear and convincing justification to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 807 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 February 20266001693
    171 West End Lane, Camden, London, NW6 2LH
  2. Allowed30 August 20243338859
    61-63 Cartwright Gardens, London, WC1H 9EL
  3. Dismissed5 January 20243323840
    139-147 Camden Road, Camden, London , NW1 9HJ
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.