Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 February 20266001693

171 West End Lane, Camden, London, NW6 2LH

described on the application form as “Retrospective Planning For Shopfront to Gloss similar to neighbours

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development provides a suitable and accessible entrance for users
  • whether the development has an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the conservation area

What decided it

The development fails to provide policy-compliant accessible access and causes less than substantial but considerable harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, with no sufficient public benefits to justify this harm under NPPF paragraph 215.

Framework references: 215

Plan policies cited: Policy C6, Policy D3, Policy D1, Policy D2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.