Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 November 20243341172

Woodside, Barracks Road, Assington , Suffolk, CO10 5LP

Planning appeal 3341172 at Woodside, Barracks Road, Assington , Suffolk, CO10 5LP (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 26 November 2024 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site provides a suitable location for the proposed development having particular regard to the development plan's spatial strategy.

2 No. bungalows offering garage parking, additional parking and gardens to a plot of undeveloped land

Authority
Babergh District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
CO10 5LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site provides a suitable location for the proposed development having particular regard to the development plan's spatial strategy
  • The effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • The effects of the proposed development upon great crested newts and whether the submitted Preliminary Ecological Assessment is sufficiently reliable
  • Whether adequate biodiversity gains would be achieved

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan's spatial strategy by locating residential development outside the settlement boundary where it does not meet any of the prescribed criteria, and this conflict is not outweighed by the modest benefits of two dwellings.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP03Policy LP01Policy ASSN1Policy ASSN2Policy LP17Policy LP24Policy ASSN7Policy LP16Policy ASSN11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed7 October 20266011354
    Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
  2. Allowed16 September 20266013583
    57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266011384
    34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007359
    Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005638
    Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.