Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 January 20253341239

95 Pye Corner, Gilston, Harlow, Essex, CM20 2RD

rear upward extension atop existing ground floor structure, rear structure is to become 2 storeys with gable end and pitched roof

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Buchanan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • if it is inappropriate development, its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of No.95 Pye Corner and the local area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails to meet the NPPF paragraph 154(c) exception for extensions because it results in disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building, and the harm to the Green Belt and character and appearance is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154, 142, 143, 153

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR1, Policy DES4, Policy HOU11, Policy AG1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.