Planning appeal decision
Plot 1, Land South of Horseman Side, Navestock, RM4 1DN
Planning appeal 3341474 at Plot 1, Land South of Horseman Side, Navestock, RM4 1DN (Brentwood Borough Council) was allowed on 16 January 2025 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the NPPF and any relevant development plan policies.
Retrospective change of use of land to Gypsy/Traveller pitch (temporary or permanent), standing of one static caravan, one touring caravan and development of hard standing and day room for an extended Gypsy/Traveller family to include site access
- Authority
- Brentwood Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Gilbert-Wooldridge T
- Postcode
- RM4 1DN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the NPPF and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether any harm would be outweighed by other considerations (such as the need for and supply of gypsy and traveller sites and the personal circumstances of the occupiers of the site)
What decided it
The finding that the appeal sites amounted to 'grey belt' land meant the proposals were not inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the resulting NPPF paragraph 11(d) balance favoured granting permission given the unmet pitch need and the occupiers' personal circumstances.
the significant weight given to unmet need for gypsy and traveller pitches and the substantial weight given to personal circumstances outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance, so the adverse impacts of granting permission would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(ii)
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy MG02Policy HP10Policy BE14Policy HP08Policy HP09
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4; Zoumbas v SSHD [2013] UKSC 74
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brentwood
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed22 October 20266007755Land at Priests Lane, Priests Lane, Brentwood, CM15 8HG
- Allowed7 October 20266009911Place Farm, Place Farm Lane, Doddinghurst, CM15 0JA
- Allowed28 September 20266009849Land Adj to Grassmere, Horseman Side, Navestock, CM14 5SU
- Allowed22 July 2026600717867 Westwood Avenue, Brentwood, CM14 4NU
- Allowed11 June 20266005149Shepherds Croft, Wigley Bush Lane, South Weald, CM14 5QN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®