Planning appeal decision
275 Addiscombe Road, Croydon, CR0 7HY
- Authority
- London Borough of Croydon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Dade E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council behaved unreasonably in respect of co-operation and pre-application discussions
- Whether the Council prevented or delayed development which should clearly be permitted
- Whether the Council failed to produce evidence to substantiate each reason for refusal, and whether reasons were based on vague, generalised or inaccurate assertions unsupported by objective analysis
- Whether the appeals were refused on grounds capable of being dealt with by conditions
- Whether the Council acted contrary to, or did not follow, well-established case law, and whether similar cases were determined in a consistent manner
- Whether reserved matters approval was refused when objections related to issues that should already have been considered at the outline stage
What decided it
The Inspector found that the Council's reasons for refusal were reasonably substantiated and that each appeal was properly dismissed on its planning merits, so the appeals could not have been avoided by different Council behaviour.
Plan policies cited: Policy SP8.12, Policy SP8.13
Judgments cited: Whiteside, R. (On the Application Of) v The Council of the London Borough of Croydon [2022] EWHC 3318 (Admin) (21 December 2022)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®