Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 December 20243341554

Land Known As Three Acres,, Stan Hill, Charlwood, RH6 0ES

Planning appeal 3341554 at Land Known As Three Acres,, Stan Hill, Charlwood, RH6 0ES (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Lawrence R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the change of use of an existing welfare building to a temporary agricultural worker’s dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Lawrence R
Postcode
RH6 0ES

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • Whether or not the proposal would provide a suitable standard of accommodation for future occupants
  • The effect of the development on protected species
  • Whether or not there is appropriate provision for vehicle and cycle parking
  • Whether or not any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, combined with substandard accommodation for future occupants and insufficient information regarding protected species impacts.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with significant harm from substandard accommodation and potential harm to protected species, are not clearly outweighed by the claimed essential need for an agricultural worker's dwelling, which has not been adequately demonstrated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 88Paragraph 89Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

59 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Dismissed15 September 20266006697
    Woodstock House, Mole Street, Ockley, RH5 5PB
  5. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.