Planning appeal decision
Land Known As Three Acres,, Stan Hill, Charlwood, RH6 0ES
Planning appeal 3341554 at Land Known As Three Acres,, Stan Hill, Charlwood, RH6 0ES (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Lawrence R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the change of use of an existing welfare building to a temporary agricultural worker’s dwelling
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Lawrence R
- Postcode
- RH6 0ES
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- Whether or not the proposal would provide a suitable standard of accommodation for future occupants
- The effect of the development on protected species
- Whether or not there is appropriate provision for vehicle and cycle parking
- Whether or not any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, combined with substandard accommodation for future occupants and insufficient information regarding protected species impacts.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with significant harm from substandard accommodation and potential harm to protected species, are not clearly outweighed by the claimed essential need for an agricultural worker's dwelling, which has not been adequately demonstrated.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 88Paragraph 89Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Dismissed15 September 20266006697Woodstock House, Mole Street, Ockley, RH5 5PB
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®