Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld10 April 20253341564

Cornflake Cottage, Pennsylvania, CHIPPENHAM, SN14 8LB

Change of use of residential dwelling (Class C3) to provide holiday accommodation (sui generis) and additional parking (Revision of P23/03059/F)

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Allen M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including that of the Cotswold National Landscape and adjacent Cotswold Way National Trail
  • The effect on highway safety and the convenience of users of the adjacent bridleway
  • The effect on the living conditions of nearby occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • If the development is inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm that is not outweighed by other considerations, combined with harm to character and appearance, highway safety, bridleway users, and living conditions of neighbours.

Framework references: 154, 155, 143, 189, 110, 115

Plan policies cited: CS5, CS34, CS1, CS9, PSP7, PSP2, PSP28, PSP40, PSP10, PSP11, PSP8, PSP27

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.