Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed18 December 20243341647

23A Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0JN

Planning appeal 3341647 at 23A Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0JN (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 18 December 2024 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind there is a nearby Building of Townscape Merit (BTM).

demolition of existing bungalow and the erection of a three-storey replacement dwelling with basement level

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harrison F
Postcode
TW11 0JN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind there is a nearby Building of Townscape Merit (BTM)
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 23 Hampton Road, with regard to outlook and the occupiers of 2A Coleshill Road, with regard to privacy

What decided it

The proposal's sensitive design response, including its height stepping down from the adjacent Building of Townscape Merit and contemporary architectural style that complements the varied character of the street scene, combined with the absence of unacceptable effects on neighbouring living conditions, justified allowing the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP4Policy LP39Policy LP8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

349 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  3. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
  4. Dismissed14 July 20266004492
    59-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
  5. Dismissed7 July 20266010184
    69 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.