Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 December 20243341795

77 Broad Lane, Hampton, TW12 3BE

Planning appeal 3341795 at 77 Broad Lane, Hampton, TW12 3BE (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 December 2024 by Inspector Robbie G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the demolition of the existing 3-bedroom dwellinghouse and garage with the erection of a replacement 6-bedroom dwellinghouse and garage

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robbie G
Postcode
TW12 3BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The living conditions of occupiers of 103 Wensleydale Road and 79 Broad Lane, with particular regard to outlook, daylight / sunlight and privacy
  • Highway and pedestrian safety

What decided it

The material harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, particularly the loss of outlook and daylight at No. 79 Broad Lane and the erosion of spaciousness between properties, could not be outweighed by the highway and pedestrian safety benefits of the revised access arrangements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP Policy LP1LP Policy LP8LP Policy LP45LP Policy LP44London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1eRLP Policy 28eRLP Policy 46eRLP Policy 47eRLP Policy 48

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

308 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  3. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
  4. Dismissed14 July 20266004492
    59-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
  5. Dismissed7 July 20266010184
    69 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.