Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 November 20243341875

55 Dome Hill, CATERHAM, CR3 6EF

demolition of garage, rear conservatory and outbuilding and erection of two-storey side addition and ground floor rear extension

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Carpenter C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the existing building and surrounding area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and considerable harm to character and appearance, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify the development.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: DP10, DP13, CSP18, DP7, CCW4, CCW5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.