Planning appeal decision
Stella Farm Alpacas, Land North of the Grange, Woodmancote Lane, Woodmancote, Emsworth, Hants, PO18 8UL
Planning appeal 3342246 at Stella Farm Alpacas, Land North of the Grange, Woodmancote Lane, Woodmancote, Emsworth, Hants, PO18 8UL (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 23 September 2024 by Inspector Edwards J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be in a suitable location having regard to policies of the LP and the Westbourne Neighbourhood Plan 2021 (the NP), the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and whether there is an essential need for an agricultural worker to live on the site.
retrospective siting of a (caravan) mobile home to provide living accommodation for an essential agricultural worker
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Edwards J
- Postcode
- PO10 8QY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be in a suitable location having regard to policies of the LP and the Westbourne Neighbourhood Plan 2021 (the NP), the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and whether there is an essential need for an agricultural worker to live on the site
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- If the development is unacceptable in any of these regards, whether there are benefits or other factors that outweigh the harm caused and so justify granting planning permission
What decided it
The absence of evidence demonstrating that the alpaca farm business is, or will become, a viable enterprise meant an essential need for a rural worker to live on site had not been established.
The significant benefits of a temporary permission enabling potential business growth and safeguarding the appellant's human rights were outweighed by the significant harm arising from conflict with the LP's countryside location and character and appearance policies.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP policy 2LP policy 37LP policy 45LP policy 33LP policy 48LP policy 1NP policy OA1NP policy LD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 88
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 October 20266009623Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
- Dismissed15 October 20266010948Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
- Dismissed5 October 202660118508 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
- Dismissed2 October 202660116151, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
- Allowed30 September 20266014666Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®