Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld19 September 20243342330

2 Palm Grove, Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 7AX

Planning appeal 3342330 at 2 Palm Grove, Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 7AX (Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 September 2024 by Inspector Hartley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the unauthorised development on the character and appearance of the area.

without planning permission, the unauthorised development and enlargement of the dwellinghouse on the land, consisting of the construction of a rear dormer roof extension (with flat roof)

Authority
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hartley D
Postcode
TS19 7AX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the unauthorised development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the unauthorised development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 1 Lealholme Grove in respect of outlook

What decided it

The dormer's disproportionate size and position cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and material loss of outlook to neighbouring occupiers, which is not outweighed by the appellant's need for additional space given that a smaller approved dormer remains capable of implementation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SD3SD8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld29 April 20263359857
    Handley Cross Leven Bank Leven Bank Road, Leven Bank Road, Yarm, Durham, TS15 9JL
  2. Notice varied and upheld16 March 20263370061
    Land at Little Meadows, Darlington Road, Elton, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 1AG
  3. Notice upheld31 March 20253357451
    Land on the East Side of Durham Road, Thorpe Thewles, Stockton on Tees , TS21 3JY
  4. Planning permission granted27 June 20223295706
    2 Malham Grove, Ingleby Barwick, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 0UE
  5. Allowed21 October 20266013736
    74a Darlington Road, Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 5ET

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.