Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 October 20243342609

24 Cassiobury Park Avenue, Watford, Herts, WD18 7LB

the erection of a 2-storey rear extension

Authority
Watford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Deane G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the local area

What decided it

The proposed rear extension would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the locally listed building as a non-designated heritage asset and its contribution to the local area, which cannot be justified by the provision of additional living space.

Plan policies cited: Policy QD6.1, Policy QD6.2, Policy QD6.4, Policy HE7.1, Policy HE7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.