®Planning appeal decision
1 Brookside Cottages Main Road, Margaretting, Ingatestone, CM4 0EG
Planning appeal 3342644 at 1 Brookside Cottages Main Road, Margaretting, Ingatestone, CM4 0EG (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 November 2024 by Inspector Dade E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
double storey side extension and single storey rear extension with part duo pitched roof and part flat roof
- Authority
- Chelmsford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Dade E
- Postcode
- CM4 0EG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal property and area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character of the Margaretting Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of no 2 Brookside Cottages, with particular regard to sunlight, daylight, and outlook
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal's failure to satisfy the disproportionality test under Policy DM11(A)(i), combined with substantial harm to Green Belt openness and considerable harm to the conservation area character that was not outweighed by modest public benefits, meant very special circumstances did not exist to justify inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S11Policy DM6Policy DM11Policy S3Policy DM13Policy DM23Policy DM29
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Chelmsford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
- Dismissed28 July 20266007350Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
- Dismissed18 May 20266006009Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ
- Allowed1 May 20266005305Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
- Allowed1 May 20266005303Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.