Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 August 20243342686

34 Clifton Road, Brent, London, NW10 4RB

Planning appeal 3342686 at 34 Clifton Road, Brent, London, NW10 4RB (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 21 August 2024 by Inspector Clark L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene.

new 2 bedroom apartment on 2nd floor of existing mixed use warehouse

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Clark L
Postcode
NW10 4RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, outlook and daylight and sunlight
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular regard to privacy and noise
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular regard to safe and secure access

What decided it

The proposal would cause material harm to the character and appearance of the street scene and would result in unacceptable loss of privacy for both existing and future occupiers, with inadequate access arrangements and insufficient evidence regarding noise protection.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BT1Brent Design Guide SPD1 2018Principle 5.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

475 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR
  3. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  4. Notice upheld12 August 20263344966
    46 Aylestone Avenue, London, NW6 7AA
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.