Planning appeal decision
162 Botany Road , Broadstairs , Kent , CT10 3SE
Planning appeal 3342693 at 162 Botany Road , Broadstairs , Kent , CT10 3SE (Thanet District Council) was dismissed on 17 January 2025 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development affects the integrity of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, which is subject to statutory protection under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, as amended.
Change of use of outbuilding from annex accommodation to holiday let accommodation
- Authority
- Thanet District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- CT10 3SE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development affects the integrity of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, which is subject to statutory protection under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, as amended
- Whether occupants of the development are provided with satisfactory living conditions, with particular regard to internal floor space, outlook and privacy
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Numbers 162 and 164 Botany Road, with particular regard to privacy, noise and disturbance
What decided it
The submitted Unilateral Undertaking was deficient and could not effectively secure mitigation of the development's significant adverse effect on the integrity of the Special Protection Area, requiring refusal under Regulation 63(5) of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP29Policy QD03Policy E08
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 124Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Thanet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed16 April 20263370118San Clu Hotel, Victoria Parade, Ramsgate, CT11 8DT
- Allowed20 November 202533709362-3 The Broadway, Ramsgate, CT11 9JN
- Dismissed20 November 20253343372The Avenue, Margate, CT9 2ST
- Notice varied and upheld5 November 20253355668Land Adjacent Former Aircraft Tower Manston Road North, Manston, CT12 5AY
- Dismissed8 October 20253362059Kent House Nursing Home, Fairfield Road, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2JY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®