Planning appeal decision
Kent House Nursing Home, Fairfield Road, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2JY
Planning appeal 3362059 at Kent House Nursing Home, Fairfield Road, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2JY (Thanet District Council) was dismissed on 8 October 2025 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the SPA.
the change of use from existing care home (Use Class C2) to 21No bedroom HMO together with erection of bin store, and alterations to landscaping and parking
- Authority
- Thanet District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- CT10 2JY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the SPA
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the efficient operation of the highway network with particular regard to vehicle parking provision
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties with particular regard to noise and disturbance
What decided it
The proposed development would have an adverse effect on the integrity of the SPA that could not be mitigated through a secured planning obligation, triggering the mandatory refusal ground under Regulation 63(5) of the Habitats Regulations.
Although the proposal would bring benefits through effective use of residential land and economic benefits, and would not cause unacceptable harm to highway safety or living conditions, the significant adverse effect on the SPA's integrity is determinative and cannot be outweighed by these benefits or the absence of a five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP28Policy SP29Policy HO19Policy QD02Policy QD03Policy TP06Policy BSP9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 112Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Thanet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266009253Land Adjacent Eastchurch Road And, Ashurst Gardens, Margate, CT9 3HY
- Allowed17 June 20266004045Land Adjacent 34 and 36 Lorne Road, Ramsgate, CT11 0AE
- Allowed15 June 2026600433017 Cliftonville Avenue, Ramsgate, CT12 6DS
- Dismissed19 May 2026600572174 Albion Road, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2UR
- Allowed8 May 20263376141Northwood Court, Millennium Way, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®