Planning appeal decision
Ashfield Hole Lane, Bentley, Farnham, GU10 5LT
Planning appeal 3343080 at Ashfield Hole Lane, Bentley, Farnham, GU10 5LT (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 November 2024 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to relevant local policies relating to development in the countryside.
one dwelling
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Redford R
- Postcode
- GU10 5LT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to relevant local policies relating to development in the countryside
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The harm to character and appearance caused by the disproportionately small plot size and resulting urbanising effect, combined with the Council's ability to demonstrate 3.59 years' housing land supply, means the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
the limited benefits of providing one dwelling and potential self-build contribution were outweighed by considerable harm to character and appearance; the conflict with housing supply policies carried little weight given the Council's 3.59-year supply, but the conflict with design and character policies carried considerable weight
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy CP2CS Policy CP10CS Policy CP14CS Policy CP19CS Policy CP20CS Policy CP29NP Policy 1NP Policy 2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 128Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hampshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed13 July 20266005917Land West of School Lane, Bentley, Farnham, Bentley, GU10 5JP
- Dismissed14 April 20266002212Land Adjacent To Riverside,, Bordon, GU35 0AD
- Dismissed1 April 20266001958Walden, Common Hill, Medstead, Hampshire, GU34 5LZ
- Allowed11 February 20263367627Avalon House Winchester Road, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5JB
- Dismissed28 January 20263372333Land to the North West of the Pines, Bighton Hill, Ropley , Hampshire, SO24 9SQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®