Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent To Riverside,, Bordon, GU35 0AD
Planning appeal 6002212 at Land Adjacent To Riverside,, Bordon, GU35 0AD (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2026 by Inspector Fish A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to the development plan and the appeal site's proximity to services and facilities.
erection of 3 x new build self-build dwellings
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Fish A
- Postcode
- GU35 0AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to the development plan and the appeal site's proximity to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and existing trees
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers having particular regard to outlook and light
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with particular regard to parking
- whether the proposed development would deliver BNG
What decided it
The failure to meet the statutory biodiversity net gain requirement, combined with harm to character and appearance, trees, and living conditions of future occupiers, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of three dwellings and housing land supply contribution.
The benefits of three dwellings, social and economic benefits, and environmental benefits from sustainable construction (moderate weight collectively) were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by harm to character and appearance, existing trees, living conditions of future occupiers, and failure to meet the statutory BNG requirement, such that the proposal was not sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11d).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP2Policy CP10Policy CP14Policy CP19Policy H14Policy CP20Policy CP29Policy CP31
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hampshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed13 July 20266005917Land West of School Lane, Bentley, Farnham, Bentley, GU10 5JP
- Dismissed1 April 20266001958Walden, Common Hill, Medstead, Hampshire, GU34 5LZ
- Allowed26 March 2026337506621 Winchester Road, Chawton, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 1RU
- Allowed11 February 20263367627Avalon House Winchester Road, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5JB
- Dismissed28 January 20263372333Land to the North West of the Pines, Bighton Hill, Ropley , Hampshire, SO24 9SQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®