Planning appeal decision
Land at Rectory Farm (North), Chescombe Road, Yatton, BS49 4BZ
Planning appeal 3343144 at Land at Rectory Farm (North), Chescombe Road, Yatton, BS49 4BZ (North Somerset Council) was allowed on 18 March 2025 by Inspector Prentis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for housing, having regard to the spatial strategy of the development plan.
Outline planning application for up to 190 homes (including 50% affordable homes), up to 500 sqm Class E floorspace, allotments, car parking, earthworks for SuDS, orchards, open space (c.70% of gross area) with play facilities, biodiversity net gain, and ancillary infrastructure, with means of access from Shiners Elms; all other matters reserved.
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Prentis D
- Postcode
- BS49 4BZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is an appropriate location for housing, having regard to the spatial strategy of the development plan
- whether the proposal would pass the flood risk sequential test set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
- whether the proposal would be safe from flood risk for its lifetime, and whether it would increase the risk of flooding elsewhere
- the nature and extent of any economic, social and environmental benefits
What decided it
The substantial weight attributed to the delivery of market and affordable housing, combined with the finding that the proposed dwellings would be safe from flooding and would not increase flood risk elsewhere, outweighed the failure of the flood risk sequential test and conflict with the spatial strategy under the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance.
The significant weight attached to the failure of the flood risk sequential test and residual flood risk, together with limited weight given to conflict with the spatial strategy and landscape harm, did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial weight given to market and affordable housing delivery and moderate weight given to economic, biodiversity and open space benefits, so the balance tipped in favour of granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS3Policy CS5Policy CS9Policy CS10Policy CS13Policy CS14Policy CS15Policy CS16Policy CS32Policy DM1Policy DM10Policy DM19Policy DM24Policy DM68Policy DM71Policy SA8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 173Paragraph 178
- Judgments
- Mead Realisations Ltd v SoS LUHC [2024] EWHC 279 (Admin); Mead Realisations Ltd v SoS HCLG [2025] EWCA Civ 32
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Somerset Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed20 March 20266001770Land at Whirlwind Road, Weston-Super-Mare, Somerset, BS24 8EF
- Dismissed13 February 202633749857 North Lane, Nailsea, North Somerset, BS48 4BT
- Allowed3 October 2025336749368 Beach Road, Weston-Super-Mare, BS23 4BG
- Dismissed3 October 20253357628Star Inn, Stone-Edge Batch, Tickenham, Clevedon, BS21 6SE
- Dismissed26 September 20253356972Land to the East (Builders Yard) of the Guide Hut, Weston Road, Long Ashton, BS41 9BJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®