®Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite Junction of Glen Lea and Nutcombe Lane, Hindhead, Surrey, GU26 6BP
the erection of a stable block (revision of WA/2023/00838)
- Authority
- Waverley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- agricultural · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Orr H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse the certificate of lawful development application was well founded, with particular regard to whether the proposed development would comprise development requiring planning permission
What decided it
On the balance of probability, the appellant failed to provide sufficient, clear and precise evidence to demonstrate that the shipping container would not require planning permission, as its size, permanence and physical attachment to the ground collectively indicated it was a building as defined in the Act.
Judgments cited: Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron & Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1QB 385; Skerrits of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No 2) [2000] 2 PLR 102
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.