Planning appeal decision
Abbey House, Bakers Row, Stratford, London, E15 3NB
Planning appeal 3343569 at Abbey House, Bakers Row, Stratford, London, E15 3NB (London Borough of Newham) was allowed on 30 October 2024 by Inspector Rollings G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of the existing buildings and the erection of a row of 2 storey terraced houses and a building of between 4 and 14 storeys to provide 74 residential units and associated landscaping and public realm improvements
- Authority
- London Borough of Newham
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Rollings G
- Postcode
- E15 3NB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed developments on the historic environment
- The effect of the proposed developments on the living conditions of surrounding occupiers, with particular reference to outlook, daylight and sunlight
- Whether the proposed developments would provide an appropriate energy and living conditions strategy, with particular reference to renewable energy, the potential for overheating of internal spaces, and sunlight for future occupiers
- The effect of the proposed developments on the local housing supply, with particular reference to the provision of affordable housing and family accommodation
What decided it
The differing degree of harm to character/appearance and to neighbours' living conditions (daylight, sunlight and outlook) tipped the planning balance in favour of Appeal A and against Appeal B under the paragraph 11 tilted balance.
For Appeal A, the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing prospects and economic/highway contributions were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts (moderate harm to living conditions); for Appeal B, significant harm to character and appearance and significant harm to living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy SP4Policy SP5Policy SP8Policy H1Policy H2Policy SC1Policy SC2Policy INF2Policy INF8Policy INF9Policy S1Policy J1Policy J3Policy D1Policy D3Policy D9Policy D6Policy HC1Policy H4Policy H5Policy H6Policy H7Policy H10Policy SI2Policy SI3Policy SI4Policy SI6Policy T2Policy T4Policy T5Policy T6Policy E11Policy S3Policy DF1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 77Paragraph 206Paragraph 226
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Newham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 20266014267Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
- Dismissed2 October 20266011081239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
- Allowed16 September 20266011381238 Caulfield Road, East Ham, London, E6 2DQ
- Notice varied and upheld10 August 2026336253632 Kerrison Road, London, E15 2TH
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026335832642 Disraeli Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®