Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20243343581

90 Thurstaston Rd, Thurstaston, Wirral, Merseyside, CH61 0HG

an open-sided car port of plan area approximately 4.4m long by 5.45m wide formed by extending forward the existing double garage double- pitched roof. The car port to be supported by the garage front wall at one end and two pillars at the other end. Roofing and brickwork of the car port will match materials of the existing garage

Authority
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hartley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed extension is inappropriate development within the Green Belt including its effect upon openness
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify development

What decided it

The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of disproportionate additions to the original building, and the harm caused by this inappropriateness and impact on openness is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 142, 152, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy GB2, Policy GB4, Policy GB5, Policy HS11, Policy LA1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.