Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed8 August 20243343667

41 Manor Gardens, Hampton, Richmond Upon Thames, TW12 2TX

Planning appeal 3343667 at 41 Manor Gardens, Hampton, Richmond Upon Thames, TW12 2TX (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 8 August 2024 by Inspector Evans L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal, and in particular the single storey rear extension, on the character and appearance of the existing property and of the local area.

two-storey side extension, single storey rear extension, the conversion of the existing garage to a habitable room, a loft conversion to a habitable room and two rear dormer extensions (amendment to ref. 23/0513/HOT)

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Evans L
Postcode
TW12 2TX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal, and in particular the single storey rear extension, on the character and appearance of the existing property and of the local area
  • the effect of the proposal, and in particular the single storey rear extension, on the living conditions of the adjoining neighbours, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The modest scale, single storey form and limited additional depth of the rear extension, combined with its offset position and the generous size of the plot, meant it would not materially harm character, appearance or neighbours' living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP8Policy 28Policy 46
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

317 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.