Planning appeal decision
6 St. James View, Ravenfield, Rotherham, S65 4NL
Planning appeal 3343784 at 6 St. James View, Ravenfield, Rotherham, S65 4NL (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 August 2024 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
a first-floor rear extension, two storey front extension and erection of detached garden room
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- McDonagh C
- Postcode
- S65 4NL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including on the Ravenfield Conservation Area (RCA)
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing harm to openness, and the material considerations cited in support do not amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify this harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS4CS23CS28SP2SP41SP55
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rotherham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 20266011173Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
- Dismissed5 June 20266004041Land South, Of 83 Newhill Road Battison Lane, Rotherham, S63 6LN
- Dismissed9 February 202660013588 Grange Gardens, Todwick, Rotherham, S26 1JR
- Dismissed30 September 202533714235 Turnshaw Road, Ulley, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 3YG
- Allowed30 September 20253371303Lynncroft Bungalow, Hard Lane, Kiveton Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 6RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®