Planning appeal decision
Poppy Fields Caravan Park, Fields Farm South, Sutton Bridge, Spalding, PE12 9XT
Planning appeal 3344342 at Poppy Fields Caravan Park, Fields Farm South, Sutton Bridge, Spalding, PE12 9XT (South Holland District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 27 November 2024 by Inspector Harbottle M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue an LDC was well founded.
Without planning permission, the material change of use of the land to a site for permanent residential use by the year-round occupation of caravans for human habitation, except for the three caravans covered by lawful development certificates granted on appeal with their location being shown hatched on Plan No.2, such occupation being in breach of condition 2 of planning permission H18-0224-18
- Authority
- South Holland District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Harbottle M
- Postcode
- PE12 9XT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue an LDC was well founded
- Whether the year-round occupation of caravans (other than the 3 caravans hatched on Plan No.2), or pitches, for human habitation accords with the development plan's spatial strategy and development management objectives and so constitutes sustainable development
- The effect of the year-round occupation of those caravans, or pitches, on the landscape character of the area
- The effect on flood risk
- The effect on the living conditions of nearby residents in terms of noise, disturbance and general activity
What decided it
The proposal's unacceptable flood risk arising from failure to satisfy the sequential and exception tests in Flood Zone 3 was decisive in the dismissal of the ground (a) deemed application, while for Appeal E the decisive factor was the sufficiency of sworn evidence proving 10 years' continuous unlawful occupation for four specific caravans only.
The significant weight attributed to the clear policy conflict from failing the sequential/exception tests on flood risk outweighed the limited weight given to the benefits of low-cost accommodation and occupier safety, tipping the balance against the year-round residential use.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 1 of the SELLPPolicy 2 of the SELLPPolicy 3 of the SELLPPolicy 4 of the SELLP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Holland
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed27 April 20266001659Land at Fendyke Farm, Off Old Fendyke, Sutton St James, PE12 0LX
- Dismissed12 March 20266001983Merkur Slots, 32-33 Hall Place, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE11 1SG
- Dismissed12 March 20263372173Little London, Long Sutton, PE12 9LE
- Allowed3 February 20263372791Caudwell Farm , Holbeach St Matthews, PE12 8EW
- Notice varied and upheld11 December 202533295616A North Road, Gedney Hill, Spalding, PE12 0NL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®