Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 December 20243344688

29 Church Walk, WORTHING, WEST SUSSEX, BN11 2LT

Planning permission already granted for a double garage and would like to make a part change of use, to maintain it as a garage/storage and add the option to inhabit it on occasion. Therefore creating warm sleeping area, kitchen/washroom and washing facilities. This will be used for the benefit of the tenants, in 29 Church Walk as an over flow for guests and for me as the landlord, to have the ability to stay there

Authority
Worthing Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Cahalane R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal building is designed as ancillary to the ground floor flat of 29 Church Walk
  • The effect of the appeal building on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, noise and disturbance and external garden space
  • Whether the appeal building would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal living space and external garden space
  • The effect of the appeal building on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The appeal building's rooflights would allow unacceptably intrusive views into the rear gardens and windows of neighbouring properties Nos 31 and 33 Church Walk, causing significant loss of privacy contrary to Policy DM5 a) viii) of the Worthing Local Plan 2023.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy DM5 b), Policy DM5 a) viii), Policy DM2, Policy DM5, Policy DM16, Policy DM17, Policy DM18

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.