Planning appeal decision
Soake Farm, Soake Road, Denmead, PO7 6JA
Planning appeal 3344776 at Soake Farm, Soake Road, Denmead, PO7 6JA (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 31 December 2024 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to its location within open countryside and the Council's adopted settlement strategy.
demolition of existing office and ancillary buildings on site; conversion of existing industrial warehouse and the construction of 9 No. residential properties consisting of 1-, 2-, 3-bedroom properties, all with associated parking, hard and soft landscaping and amended access
- Authority
- Winchester City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- PO7 6JA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to its location within open countryside and the Council's adopted settlement strategy
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of The Coach House, with particular regard to privacy, outlook and light impacts
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to access design and on-site parking provision
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the Council's adopted settlement strategy by introducing market residential development in open countryside outside settlement boundaries, contrary to Policy MTRA4, and would materially harm the character and appearance of the area through its unduly dense layout and incongruous architectural design.
The modest benefits of housing supply contribution and short-term economic benefits from construction were outweighed by the conflict with the development plan, the material harm to character and appearance, and the unsuitability of the countryside location under the Council's settlement strategy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy MTRA4Policy CP18Policy CP13Policy DM16Policy DM17Policy CP10Policy DM18
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 125Paragraph 135Paragraph 116Paragraph 73Paragraph 8Paragraph 12
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Winchester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed22 May 20266003190Hiawatha, Chapel Road, Swanmore, Hampshire, SO322QA
- Dismissed27 November 20253366385Unit D, Knowle Village, Fareham, PO17 5FL
- Dismissed27 November 20253366363Knowle Village, Farnham, PO17 5FL
- Allowed19 November 20253366618Land at Southwick Road/School Road, Wickham, PO17 6FE
- Allowed4 July 20253355833Stratton Highways Road, Compton, Winchester, SO21 2DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®