Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 January 20253344804

12 Chestnut Lane & Jig Store And Garage, Hazlemere, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire , HP15 7BZ

‘outline application (including details of layout/scale/access/appearance) for the demolition of the existing nursery building hard paving and garages and the erection of 2 x 3 bedroom semi-detached two storey dwellings’

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hall R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal is acceptable with respect to the loss of the nursery
  • whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal is acceptable with respect to affordable housing provision
  • whether the proposal is acceptable with respect to accessible housing provision
  • whether the proposed access arrangements are acceptable with regard to the requirements under Policy HW14 of the Local Plan
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to the living conditions of the future occupants of plot 1 within the wider scheme, with respect to privacy

What decided it

The enduring harm from the loss of the nursery and its associated employment provision, together with the lack of affordable housing provision, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing supply and other modest benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.

The contribution to housing supply (considerable benefit) and modest benefits from economic activity and biodiversity net gain were outweighed by the enduring harm from loss of the nursery and employment provision (considerable weight) and the lack of affordable housing (moderate weight), resulting in the proposal not representing sustainable development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy HW14, Policy DM29, Policy DM5, Policy DM24, Policy DM41, Policy CP9, Policy DM35, Policy CP7, Policy DM21, Policy DM6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.