Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld1 June 20263356208

St Regis Park, Bassetsbury Lane, High Wycombe, HP11 1RB

without planning permission, the laying of hardstanding

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the hardstanding on biodiversity

What decided it

The hardstanding has significantly and harmfully eroded local biodiversity in conflict with the development plan, and there are no material considerations that indicate the decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan.

Plan policies cited: Policy CP10, Policy DM34, Policy HW13, Policy DM11, Policy DM13, Policy DM14

Judgments cited: Miller Mead v MHLG [1962] 2 WLR 225; Oates v SSCLG v Canterbury CC [2018] EWCA Civ 2229; Payne v NAW & Caerphilly BC [2007] JPL 117

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.