Planning appeal decision
St Regis Park, Bassetsbury Lane, High Wycombe, HP11 1RB
without planning permission, the laying of hardstanding
- Authority
- Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Hawkins S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the hardstanding on biodiversity
What decided it
The hardstanding has significantly and harmfully eroded local biodiversity in conflict with the development plan, and there are no material considerations that indicate the decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan.
Plan policies cited: Policy CP10, Policy DM34, Policy HW13, Policy DM11, Policy DM13, Policy DM14
Judgments cited: Miller Mead v MHLG [1962] 2 WLR 225; Oates v SSCLG v Canterbury CC [2018] EWCA Civ 2229; Payne v NAW & Caerphilly BC [2007] JPL 117
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®