Planning appeal decision
Land at Wellhouse Lane, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, RH15 0BN
Planning appeal 3344963 at Land at Wellhouse Lane, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, RH15 0BN (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 13 February 2025 by Inspector Wallis D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the development upon the character and appearance of the area.
Nine dwellings comprising two terraces and a pair of semi-detached units
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wallis D
- Postcode
- RH15 0BN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effects of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
- whether or not the development would be accessible by different modes of transport
- the effects upon highway safety
- whether or not the development would provide an acceptable level and quality of affordable housing units
- the effects upon local drainage infrastructure
- whether or not the development would have an adverse effect on social infrastructure
What decided it
The combination of significant harm to character and appearance, unacceptable highway safety risk from the unresolved visibility obstruction, and failure to meet the criteria for a rural exception site under Policy DP32 meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations of sufficient weight to overcome this.
The benefits of additional affordable housing were outweighed by the harm to character and appearance, the unacceptable highway safety risk, and the failure to meet the locational and process requirements for a rural exception site; the five-year housing land supply meant the tilted balance did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP18DP26DP21DP32DP6DP12DP15Policy 6Policy 9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 189Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed10 September 20266011079Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL
- Notice varied and upheld6 July 20263376721Land Fir Trees Place, Turners Hill Road, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HQ
- Dismissed30 April 20266002774Rocklands, Church Lane, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6UP
- Allowed16 September 20253363187Land Adjacent to Hilgay Cottage , Birchwood Grove, Burgess Hill, West Sussex
- Allowed20 August 20253366246Firs Farm, Copthorne Common, Copthorne, West Sussex, RH10 3LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®