Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 October 20243345088

(Adjacent to) Brentwood (S26 4AJ), Aughton Lane, Aston, Rotherham , S26 4AJ

Planning appeal 3345088 at (Adjacent to) Brentwood (S26 4AJ), Aughton Lane, Aston, Rotherham , S26 4AJ (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 October 2024 by Inspector Spataru A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan.

for outline application for the erection of dwellinghouse with all matters reserved

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Spataru A
Postcode
S26 2AJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness is not clearly outweighed by the limited social, economic and personal benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS4Policy SP2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

28 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011173
    Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
  2. Dismissed5 June 20266004041
    Land South, Of 83 Newhill Road Battison Lane, Rotherham, S63 6LN
  3. Dismissed9 February 20266001358
    8 Grange Gardens, Todwick, Rotherham, S26 1JR
  4. Dismissed30 September 20253371423
    5 Turnshaw Road, Ulley, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 3YG
  5. Allowed30 September 20253371303
    Lynncroft Bungalow, Hard Lane, Kiveton Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 6RP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.