Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 May 20253345127

44 Church Lane , Cheveley, Newmarket, CB8 9DJ

Planning appeal 3345127 at 44 Church Lane , Cheveley, Newmarket, CB8 9DJ (East Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 13 May 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: effect of the proposal on trees on and surrounding the appeal site.

Construction of a single two storey dwelling with cart shed garage, new garden wall and access drive. Dismantling the existing cart shed and store and reassembling the cart shed garage and store in two separate buildings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B
Postcode
CB8 9DJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effect of the proposal on trees on and surrounding the appeal site
  • biodiversity net gain and protected species
  • character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to the setting of the nearby 44 Church Lane (No. 44) which is a non-designated heritage asset, and the setting of the Cheveley Conservation Area
  • living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of No. 44, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the proposal would not cause harm to trees T23 and T30 and the absence of substantive evidence regarding protected species, contrary to Policies ENV 1 and ENV 7 of the Local Plan and the statutory duty to have regard to biodiversity conservation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV 1Policy ENV 2Policy ENV 7Policy ENV 11Policy CHEV 7Policy CHEV 11Policy CHEV 12Policy CHEV 14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009201
    Rose Garden Cottege, 13 Soham Road, Fordham, Ely, CB7 5LD
  2. Allowed14 October 20266012656
    Land North East Of 70 St Johns Avenue, Newmarket, CB8 8DE
  3. Allowed3 August 20266009432
    Boundary Farm, Sutton Road, Witchford, CB62HX
  4. Allowed3 August 20266009280
    15 Newnham Street, Ely, CB7 4PG
  5. Allowed3 August 20266009239
    15 Newnham Street, Ely, CB7 4PG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.