Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20243345196

Tower House Chertsey Road, Shepperton, TW17 9NU

Planning appeal 3345196 at Tower House Chertsey Road, Shepperton, TW17 9NU (Spelthorne Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 December 2024 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether condition No 4 is reasonable and necessary having regard to flood risk.

the erection of two storey house following demolition of the Tower House, adjacent outbuildings and stables , without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref PA/01/0224, dated 27 September 2002

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
TW17 9NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether condition No 4 is reasonable and necessary having regard to flood risk
  • Whether condition No 4 is reasonable and necessary having regard to the openness of the Green Belt

What decided it

The condition is both reasonable and necessary to protect the functional floodplain from flood risk and to maintain Green Belt openness, which were fundamental to justifying the original permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LO1 of the Spelthorne Core Strategy and Policies DPD (2009)Policy GB1 of the Spelthorne Borough Local Plan Saved Policies (2008)Policy EN2 of the Spelthorne Core Strategy and Policies DPD (2009)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 54Paragraph 55Paragraph 56Paragraph 142Paragraph 165Paragraph 173

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

95 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Spelthorne Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld13 May 20263345013
    Land to the South of Bedfont Road, Stanwell, Staines, TW19 7LE
  2. Dismissed17 March 20263375737
    Former Fordbridge Service Station, Kingston Road, Ashford, TW15 3SE
  3. Dismissed30 January 20263375599
    Plot 2, Sandhills Meadow , Shepperton, TW17 9HY
  4. Dismissed26 January 20263348103
    Land South East of The Ranges (Addressed As 1A Priory Stables), Chertsey Road, Shepperton, TW17 9NU
  5. Notice varied and upheld26 January 20263335127
    1A Priory Stables, Shepperton, TW17 9NU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.