Planning appeal decision
Pavement O/S 3 Trinity Street, Coventry, CV1 1FJ
Planning appeal 3345210 at Pavement O/S 3 Trinity Street, Coventry, CV1 1FJ (Coventry City Council) was dismissed on 27 February 2025 by Inspector Walker R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed developments/advertisements on the visual amenity of the area, having regard to the setting of the Lady Herbert's Garden Conservation Area, the Hill Top Conservation Area and whether the proposed developments/advertisements would preserve the listed buildings (Holy Trinity Church Grade I, Old Grammar School Grade I, Blue Coat School Grade II*, The Ribbon Factory Grade II) or their settings.
the installation of an advertisement display within proposed free standing unit (FSU)
- Authority
- Coventry City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- advertisement · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Walker R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed developments/advertisements on the visual amenity of the area, having regard to the setting of the Lady Herbert's Garden Conservation Area, the Hill Top Conservation Area and whether the proposed developments/advertisements would preserve the listed buildings (Holy Trinity Church Grade I, Old Grammar School Grade I, Blue Coat School Grade II*, The Ribbon Factory Grade II) or their settings
- Public Safety (Appeals C and D)
What decided it
The less than substantial but significant harm to the settings of designated heritage assets and visual amenity, accorded great weight under paragraph 215 of the Framework and section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, outweighed the moderate public benefits of the proposed developments.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of designated heritage assets and visual amenity, given great weight, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits arising from the provision of electronic communication systems, defibrillator, Wi-Fi, green energy and advertising.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CC1 of the Coventry City Centre Area Action PlanPolicy DE1 of the Coventry Local PlanPolicy HE2 of the Coventry Local PlanPolicy AC2 of the Coventry Local PlanPolicy AC4 of the Coventry Local Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 214Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Coventry
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 October 2026601320475 Hurst Road, Coventry, CV6 6EL
- Dismissed7 October 20266008793260a Hogs End Farm, Hawkes Mill Lane, Coventry, CV5 9FJ
- Dismissed5 October 20266012888391-397 Coventry Fruit And Vegetable Wholesale Market, Swan Lane, Coventry, CV2 4QN
- Dismissed2 October 20266010199Grass Verge at Ferrers Close, Coventry, CV4 9RA
- Allowed25 September 20266011410236 Hawkes Mill Lane, Coventry, CV5 9FJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®