Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 November 20243345241

Buildings at The Orchards , Roxwell Road, Writtle, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 3SA

Planning appeal 3345241 at Buildings at The Orchards , Roxwell Road, Writtle, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 3SA (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 November 2024 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if so, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations that would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposals.

timber cabin garden building and adjacent timber viewing deck within the garden of an existing dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Storey P
Postcode
CM1 3SA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if so, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations that would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposals
  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for housing, having regard to access to services and sustainable transport (Appeal B only)

What decided it

Both appeals failed because the proposals constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify them: Appeal A because the building is materially larger than its predecessor, and Appeal B because the visual impact would harm openness despite spatial benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S1Policy S7Policy S11Policy DM6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 109Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chelmsford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730
    Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
  2. Dismissed28 July 20266007350
    Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
  3. Dismissed18 May 20266006009
    Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ
  4. Allowed1 May 20266005305
    Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
  5. Allowed1 May 20266005303
    Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.