Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 October 20243345253

Martlets, The Common, Chipperfield , Herts, WD4 9BS

Planning appeal 3345253 at Martlets, The Common, Chipperfield , Herts, WD4 9BS (Dacorum Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2024 by Inspector Rawle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the replacement of approved parking area to the side of the dwellings with new parking area to the front

Authority
Dacorum Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rawle S
Postcode
WD4 9BS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area and in particular whether it would preserve or conserve the Chipperfield Conservation Area
  • if the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the great weight afforded to the less than substantial harm to the Chipperfield Conservation Area were not clearly outweighed by other considerations, including the fallback position, so as to constitute the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS5Policy CS6Policy CS12Policy CS27
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

64 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dacorum

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266003892
    Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011489
    Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
  3. Dismissed28 August 20266010273
    118 A Hempstead Road, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8AL
  4. Notice upheld14 July 20263350930
    Land Adjancet to The Old Brickworks, Spring Garden Lane, Northchurch, Herts, HP4 3GY
  5. Dismissed17 June 20266006042
    Land South of A4251 (North of A41), Tring, HP23 5RB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.