Planning appeal decision
Land North of Possingham Farmhouse, Ashford Road, Great Chart, TN26 3BQ
Planning appeal 3345454 at Land North of Possingham Farmhouse, Ashford Road, Great Chart, TN26 3BQ (Ashford Borough Council) was allowed on 10 February 2025 by Inspector Young D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area.
an outline application for the development of up to 655 residential dwellings (including 30% affordable dwellings) to consider access only (excluding internal circulation routes), with all other matters reserved. This
- Authority
- Ashford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Young D
- Postcode
- TN26 3BQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area
- Whether traffic from the proposed development would have an unacceptable effect on the safe operation and capacity of the A28 corridor between the Matalan and Tank roundabouts
- Whether the development would be located in a sustainable location where future residents would be able to access local services and facilities using sustainable modes of transport
- Whether the proposed development would result in harm to Possingham Farmhouse (Grade II listed)
- Whether a financial contribution towards secondary school provision is necessary and reasonable in all respects
- Whether the benefits of the scheme would outweigh any identified harm
What decided it
The substantial benefits of the scheme, particularly housing delivery in an area unable to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, clearly outweighed the limited landscape, heritage and other harms even under the ordinary planning balance.
The benefits of the scheme (655 dwellings including 30% affordable housing, WwTW funding benefits, economic benefits, biodiversity net gain, public access and highway/PROW improvements) clearly outweighed the identified moderate landscape/visual harm and limited heritage harm, even on the ordinary section 38(6) 'flat' balance, and would also survive the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HOU5 f)Policy HOU5 c)Policy COM2Policy SP1Policy HOU1Policy HOU14Policy HOU6Policy COM1Policy CS18aCGAAP Policy CG9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 76Paragraph 57Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 180Paragraph 188Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Ashford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266007592Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
- Allowed9 April 20263368725Land Adjacent to the Bull Inn, Bethersden, Ashford, TN26 3LB
- Allowed30 March 20266002407Belvedere Stables, High Halden Road, Nr Ashford, Kent, TN30 6SY
- Dismissed27 March 20263376207Parker Farm, Hamstreet, Ashford, Kent, TN26 2JQ
- Allowed24 March 20263374095Land to the South of Chart Leacon Depot, Leacon Road, Ashford, TN23 4AB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®