Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 September 20243345551

3 Frances Mews, Romford, RM3 9FP

Planning appeal 3345551 at 3 Frances Mews, Romford, RM3 9FP (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 11 September 2024 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area.

loft conversion with dormer to rear, hip to gable, and roof lights to front

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T
Postcode
RM3 9FP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at Oldmead Close and at Nos 120/122 Gooshays Drive, with particular regard to outlook
  • whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of energy efficiency

What decided it

The flat-roofed dormer with windows would unacceptably erode the cohesive character of the estate by conflicting with the plain pitched roof forms that predominate, particularly as visible from the public footpath and open space on Gooshays Drive.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 26 (Urban Design) of the Havering Local Plan (2021)Policy D4 (Delivering Good Design) of The London Plan (2021)Policy 7 (Residential Design and Amenity) of the Havering Local Plan (2021)Policy 36 (Low Carbon Design and Renewable Energy) of the Havering Local Plan (2021)Policy SI 2 (Minimising Greenhouse Gas Emissions) of The London Plan (2021)Policy SI 3 (Energy Infrastructure) of The London Plan (2021)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

174 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.