Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 November 20243345853

5 Medway, Queensbury, Bradford, BD13 2RQ

Planning appeal 3345853 at 5 Medway, Queensbury, Bradford, BD13 2RQ (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 8 November 2024 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

construction of one bed bungalow

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
BD13 2RQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • Whether the development would provide adequate living conditions for future residents with particular reference to space standards, amenity space provision, outlook and daylight

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance combined with inadequate daylight provision to future residents significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefit of delivering one additional dwelling in an area with a shortfall in housing land supply.

The benefits of delivering one new dwelling and contributing to housing land supply were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and living conditions (daylight), such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DS1Policy DS3Policy DS5Policy SC9Policy HO9A Guide to Designing in Bradford Supplementary Planning Document (2020)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 225

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

55 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013460
    Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266012661
    95 Godwin Street, Bradford, BD1 3PP
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266012872
    Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266012715
    247, Girlington Road, Bradford, BD8 9NX
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266010517
    66 Kirkgate, Bradford, BD18 3EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.