Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 October 20243345943

Abbey House, Bakers Row, Stratford, London, E15 3NB

Planning appeal 3345943 at Abbey House, Bakers Row, Stratford, London, E15 3NB (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 30 October 2024 by Inspector Rollings G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of the existing buildings and the erection of a row of 2 storey terraced houses and a building of between 4 and 14 storeys to provide 74 residential units and associated landscaping and public realm improvements

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Rollings G
Postcode
E15 3NB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed developments on the historic environment
  • The effect of the proposed developments on the living conditions of surrounding occupiers, with particular reference to outlook, daylight and sunlight
  • Whether the proposed developments would provide an appropriate energy and living conditions strategy, with particular reference to renewable energy, the potential for overheating of internal spaces, and sunlight for future occupiers
  • The effect of the proposed developments on the local housing supply, with particular reference to the provision of affordable housing and family accommodation

What decided it

The determining factor was the differing scale of harm to character/appearance and neighbouring living conditions between the two schemes when weighed under the tilted balance against housing and other benefits: Appeal A's lesser harm did not outweigh the benefits, whereas Appeal B's greater harm did.

Under the tilted balance, the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing prospects, economic and highway improvements outweighed the identified harms for Appeal A, but for Appeal B the harm to character and appearance combined with greater harm to living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweighed those same benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy SP4Policy SP5Policy SP8Policy H1Policy H2Policy SC1Policy SC2Policy INF2Policy INF8Policy INF9Policy J1Policy J3Policy S1Policy D1Policy D3Policy D9Policy D6Policy HC1Policy H4Policy H5Policy H6Policy H7Policy H10Policy SI2Policy SI3Policy SI4Policy SI6Policy T2Policy T4Policy T5Policy T6Policy E11Policy S3Policy DF1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 77Paragraph 206Paragraph 226

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

360 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  2. Notice upheld3 July 20263350259
    117 Windsor Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 0RA
  3. Allowed13 May 20263375939
    Rear of 1 - 3 Glasgow Road, London , E13 9HW
  4. Notice upheld29 April 20263373883
    137 Claremont Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 0PY
  5. Dismissed19 March 20263377089
    39 Wellington Road, East Ham, London, E6 2RQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.