Planning appeal decision
Land at Gloucester Road, Corse, Gloucestershire, GL19 3RQ
Planning appeal 3346275 at Land at Gloucester Road, Corse, Gloucestershire, GL19 3RQ (Forest of Dean District Council) was allowed on 5 December 2024 by Inspector Bristow T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the development proposal.
described on the application form as ‘outline application for 50 dwellings (40% affordable) with public open space, landscaping and sustainable drainage system (SuDS). All matters reserved except for access and layout.’
- Authority
- Forest of Dean District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Bristow T
- Postcode
- GL19 3RQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the development proposal
- the landscape effects of the scheme
- the heritage effects of the scheme
What decided it
Under the NPPF paragraph 11.d)ii tilted balance, the limited or negligible harms identified from location, landscape and heritage effects did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery.
The negligible-to-limited harms arising from location, landscape and heritage effects were outweighed by the substantial public benefits, principally the delivery of 50 dwellings including 20 affordable homes, tipping the balance in favour of allowing the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CSP.1CSP.4CSP.5CSP.9CSP.16AP1AP.4AP.5AP107AP108AP109
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 63Paragraph 70Paragraph 76Paragraph 77Paragraph 104Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 135Paragraph 173Paragraph 180Paragraph 189Paragraph 194Paragraph 200Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209Paragraph 224Paragraph 225Paragraph 226
- Judgments
- Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd. & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 168, [2015] EWHC 132 (Admin) and [2015] EWHC 410 (Admin); Monkhill Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 74 (28 January 2021); Bedford Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Nuon UK Ltd. [2013] EWHC 2847 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd. v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Forest of Dean
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed2 July 20266003596The Laurels Shop, A4136, Staunton (Coleford), GL16 8PA
- Allowed19 May 20266002462Land at Moat Farm, Newent, GL181JG
- Dismissed13 March 20266000913Land Adjacent To The Kings Head Public House, Birdwood, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL19 3EF
- Allowed27 August 20253355832Forest Lodge St. Whites Road, Cinderford, GL14 3ES
- Dismissed21 August 20253361652Eastwood Lodge Farm, The Chase, Woolaston, Lydney, GL15 6PT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®