Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld15 December 20253346324

386 Glebe Farm, West End Road, Ruislip, HA4 6QX

Retrospective permission for the installation of six pole mounted lights sited six metres above ground level

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Lewis D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether copies of the enforcement notice were served as required by section 172 of the Act and if not whether substantial prejudice has occurred
  • Whether the requirements of the enforcement notice are excessive having regard to the purpose of the notice
  • Whether the period for compliance is reasonable
  • The effects of the lighting installation on the Metropolitan Green Belt, the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the amenity of the nearby residential properties

What decided it

The asymmetric floodlamps proposed in Appeal C provide greater control on upward light and light spillage compared to the symmetrical LED lights in Appeal B, thereby adequately limiting light pollution impacts on neighbouring residential properties in accordance with paragraph 198 of the Framework.

Framework references: 154, 155, 110, 115, 198

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy G2, London Plan Policy D3, DMP Policy DMEI 4, DMP Policy DMHB 11, DMP Policy BE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.