Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds30 December 20253346355

High Acres Willis Lane, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5AP

Planning appeal 3346355 at High Acres Willis Lane, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5AP (East Hampshire District Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 30 December 2025 by Inspector Kean G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the breach of planning control alleged in the enforcement notice has occurred as a matter of fact.

within the last four years and without planning permission, the creation of a vehicular access from the Land onto a classified road (Willis Lane C Class Road)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Kean G
Postcode
GU34 5AP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the breach of planning control alleged in the enforcement notice has occurred as a matter of fact
  • Whether at the time the enforcement notice was issued, it was too late to take enforcement action
  • Whether there has been a breach of planning control, for example because permission has already been granted or is permitted development
  • Whether the development is justified having regard to the development plan policies

What decided it

The Inspector's assessment that the additional access was reasonably required to facilitate the configuration of the established separate residential plots and could be accommodated without causing increased danger to highway users, thereby complying with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy CP2Policy CP19Policy CP20Policy CP29Policy CP31

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Hampshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Invalid29 July 20263348750
    8 Downhouse Road, Waterlooville, PO8 0TX
  2. Allowed27 July 20266005204
    Hattingley Farm, Hattingley Road, Medstead, GU34 5NQ
  3. Allowed9 July 20266007330
    Land West of Woodside, Hewshott Lane, Liphook, GU30 7SS
  4. Allowed7 July 20263373291
    The Pigeon Coop, Deans Field , Kingsley, Hampshire, GU35 9FT
  5. Dismissed17 June 20266005417
    Land to the South of Kingsley Tennis Centre, Forge Road, Bordon, GU35 9NG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.