Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 December 20243346636

MARLBOROUGH COURT, GREEN CLOSE, BROOKMANS PARK, AL9 7ST

the removal of existing roof containing store, first floor extension containing a 2 bed flat, new roof structure containing 1 bed flat with front facing dormers, 3 storey side extension containing staircase and balconies and additional dormer to separate flat, extension to adjoining flat number 19

Authority
Welwyn Hatfield Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowden N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupants with particular regard to noise
  • whether sufficient vehicle parking is available for the proposed development
  • whether there are adequate refuse storage arrangements to cater for the proposed development
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm to living conditions from railway noise exposure, combined with inadequate parking and refuse arrangements, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of two additional dwellings when assessed against the Framework.

The benefits of two new dwellings and efficient use of brownfield land in a sustainable location were given minor weight, but were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to living conditions from noise exposure and inadequate parking and refuse arrangements.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: SADM11, SADM18, SP9, SADM2, SADM12, SP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.