Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 February 20253346854

27 Arcadia Road, Christchurch, BH23 2JF

to sever the land and construct a 3 bedroom chalet bungalow with parking and private garden

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Davies N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area (the DHSPA) and the Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation (the DHSAC)
  • The effect of the development on the integrity of the River Avon Special Area of Conservation (the RASAC)
  • The effect of the development on the protected tree in the front garden of 27 Arcadia Road

What decided it

The absence of secured mitigation measures to prevent adverse effects on the integrity of three internationally protected habitats sites meant the proposal conflicted with Policy ME1 of the development plan, and the housing land supply shortfall could not override this conflict under paragraph 195 of the NPPF.

The limited benefits of providing one additional dwelling and modest economic benefits were outweighed by the conflict with development plan policy protecting internationally designated wildlife sites and the requirement in paragraph 193 of the NPPF that significant harm to biodiversity should result in refusal of permission.

Framework references: 78, 195, 11, 61, 73, 12, 193

Plan policies cited: Policy ME1 of the Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Part 1 - Core Strategy (2014), Saved Policy ENV21 of the Borough of Christchurch Local Plan (2001), Policy HE2 of the Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.