Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed15 April 20253346917

8-10 Leith View, North Holmwood, Dorking, RH5 4TG

Planning appeal 3346917 at 8-10 Leith View, North Holmwood, Dorking, RH5 4TG (Mole Valley District Council) was allowed on 15 April 2025 by Inspector Boffin D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision is well-founded, turning on whether the proposal amounted to 'development' as defined by section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

the combination of 8 and 10 Leith View into a single dwellinghouse and internal works therein; the installation of patio doors to the rear elevation; the erection of solar panels on the roof; and the installation of a log burner and flue

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Boffin D
Postcode
RH5 4TG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision is well-founded, turning on whether the proposal amounted to 'development' as defined by section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990

What decided it

The loss of one residential unit has only a de minimis effect on housing delivery and the resulting two-bedroom dwelling reflects the largest proportion of required market housing, therefore the proposal does not amount to a material change of use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Mole Valley Local Plan Policy HSG1Mole Valley Local Plan Policy CS3Mole Valley Local Plan Policy H1Mole Valley Local Plan Policy H9
Judgments
Richmond upon Thames LBC v SSETR & Richmond upon Thames Churches Housing Trust [2001] JPL 84

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

33 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010634
    The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266003694
    1 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266010203
    High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.